See All Resources

Supreme Court Decision: Limit the EPA’s Authority to Regulate Climate Emissions

shutterstock 159118949

By now you have read a lot about the Supreme Court decision to limit the EPA’s authority to regulate climate emissions. I cannot say I am shocked. 

One of our beliefs at Healthcare Climate ActionWorks is that the solution to climate change will not come from the international meetings, or from the federal government, or from the courts. The solutions to climate change will come from communities. Health systems  – which are the largest non-profit organization in virtually every community in the US – must take the lead. The Supreme Courts EPA ruling just further confirms that belief. 

What is shocking about the ruling? It is not about anything that the EPA has done.  The court took action – for the first time ever – on a non-event. There was no regulation in place for the court to review. The complainants got the Court to rule that the EPA cannot even try to regulate emissions. It just demonstrates the power of the fossil fuel industry to get what it wants. Another reason that health system’s need to take the lead.

And that is easy – because this is a health care issue. Xavier Becerra, HHS secretary said that this decision is  “a public health disaster.” 

That’s right. 

Climate Impact Lab has developed a lives saved calculator that uses a model of historical death records and localized temperature projections to generate estimate for the number of lives saved if emissions are eliminated. The number is very conservative because the analysis only looks at the risk from from extreme heat. It does not look at other climate impacts like flooding and strong storms. But even with it’s conservative approach if just  10 US states cut their emissions to net zero that would save 3.7 million lives worldwide. Texas alone could save 1.1 million lives.  Idaho is capable of saving about 68,000 lives, Kansas could save 126,000 lives and Hawaii could save about 16,000 lives.

And as I have said before, the health impacts come not just from climate change, they come from the particulate emissions that come from burning any fossil fuel. Those emissions kill over 8 million people EVERY YEAR. Smoking “only” kills 3 million. 

If you think that health systems, like doctors, should abide by the Hippocratic Oath to “first do no harm” – then health systems must eliminate their use of fossil fuels to stop harming people today with particulate emissions, and tomorrow with the impact of heat, drought, fires, storms, and floods. 

Now is not the time to complain about the Supreme Court – it is the time to take action to eliminate your health system’s emissions.

RELATED NET ZERO CONTENT YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

Biden Administration has announced a 2 year pause on any new tariffs on solar panels

Have you tried to buy an American made TV?  Very tough to do – in fact, impossible.  There are things that we simply no longer manufacture in the US because of the high cost of manufacturing here, and the very low cost of container shipping.   We do still manufacture solar panels here, but not many,

Health Systems Can Act to Stop a Health Crisis

It has been quite a week.  Southeast Asia – including India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh –  is having such extreme heat that it is decreasing crop yields by up to 15%.  India ended its wheat exports for fear that it will not have enough to feed its own people. And of course – the heat itself

Healthcare Climate ActionWorks quickly reduces health system emissions by 10%

Getting your health system to net zero emissions will be no easy task.  60-80% of a health system’s emissions come from the supply chain.  Clearly systems will need to set new emissions reductions criteria for suppliers and GPOs.  For the other 20-40 of a health system’s emissions – which are those emissions that your health